Volume 23 No 10 (2025)
 Download PDF
SPINAL TUMOURS: CLASSIFICATION, CLINICAL CHALLENGES, AND EVOLVING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES - THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY
Dr Anand Sudhakarrao Dank, Dr Umesh Balasaheb Kulkarni, Dr Baburao Kishanrao Kulkarni, Dr Gauri Anand Dank, Dr Manjiri Mangesh Ranawade
Abstract
Background: Spinal tumours represent a diverse group of lesions with variable biological behaviour and clinical outcomes. Categorizing these tumours into “good,” “bad,” and “ugly” subgroups facilitates understanding of their natural history, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic strategies. Aim: To categorize spinal tumours based on biological behaviour and to analyze their clinical features, diagnostic approaches, therapeutic strategies, and treatment outcomes. Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care neurosurgical centre between 2011 and 2024. A total of 251 patients with histologically or radiologically confirmed spinal tumours were included. Tumours were categorized into benign (good), malignant/aggressive (bad), and rare/complex (ugly) groups. Clinical profiles, diagnostic modalities, surgical outcomes, use of adjuvant therapies, and recurrence rates were analyzed. Statistical analyses included descriptive measures, Chi-square tests, ANOVA, and Kaplan-Meier survival where applicable, with a p-value <0.05 considered significant. Results: Benign tumours constituted the majority (72.1%), with schwannomas (43.8%) and meningiomas (25.1%) most common. Malignant/aggressive lesions comprised 8.0% of cases, while rare/complex tumours such as ependymomas formed 19.9%. Patients with malignant tumours were significantly older (mean 57.9 years, p<0.001) and presented with shorter symptom duration compared to benign or rare groups. Gross-total resection was highest in benign tumours (88.4%), intermediate in rare/complex (62.0%), and lowest in malignant cases (35.0%) (p<0.001). Two-year recurrence was lowest in benign (5%) but markedly higher in malignant (40%) and rare/complex (22%) tumours (p<0.001). Use of adjuvant radiotherapy was significantly greater in malignant (75%) and rare/complex tumours (38%) compared to benign lesions (6.6%). Advanced imaging modalities and intraoperative adjuncts were more frequently utilized in the malignant and rare/complex groups. Conclusion: Spinal tumours display distinct clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic patterns depending on their biological behaviour. Benign tumours have favourable outcomes with surgery, whereas malignant and rare/complex lesions require multimodal management and advanced adjuncts, with higher recurrence and adjuvant therapy needs. A classification into “good,” “bad,” and “ugly” categories offers a practical framework for clinical decision-making and highlights the importance of individualized, multidisciplinary care in spinal oncology.
Keywords
Spinal tumours. Gross-total resection. Multimodal management.
Copyright
Copyright © Neuroquantology

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Articles published in the Neuroquantology are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJECSE right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.