Volume 24 No 4 (2026)
Download PDF
A Comparative Study of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Normal Vaginal Delivery Versus Cesarean Section at a Tertiary Care Center
Dr Leela Vitthal Karpe, Dr.Poonam Ramrao Kalyankar, Dr.Neelam Dilip Bagal
Abstract
Background: The mode of delivery plays a crucial role in determining maternal and fetal outcomes. With the rising trend of cesarean section rates worldwide, it is essential to evaluate and compare the outcomes associated with normal vaginal delivery and cesarean section, particularly in tertiary care settings where high-risk pregnancies are frequently managed. Aim: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes in normal vaginal delivery and cesarean section at a tertiary care center. Objectives: To assess maternal outcomes associated with normal vaginal delivery and cesarean section. To evaluate fetal outcomes in both modes of delivery. To compare complications and overall outcomes between vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Materials and Methods:
This hospital-based comparative cross-sectional study was conducted on 140 pregnant women admitted for delivery at a tertiary care hospital. Participants were divided into two groups: normal vaginal delivery (n=72) and cesarean section (n=68). Data were collected using a structured proforma, including demographic details, obstetric history, maternal outcomes (blood loss,
complications, hospital stay), and fetal outcomes (birth weight, APGAR score, NICU admission). Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate tests such as chi-square test and Student’s t test, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Baseline characteristics were
comparable between the two groups except for previous LSCS, which was significantly higher in the cesarean group (p=0.001). Maternal outcomes such as blood loss and duration of hospital stay were significantly higher in the cesarean section group (p<0.001). Wound infection and delayed maternal recovery were also significantly more common in the cesarean group. Fetal outcomes
showed significantly better APGAR scores and lower NICU admission rates in the vaginal delivery group. Respiratory distress was significantly higher in the cesarean group (p=0.013). Overall maternal and fetal complications were significantly higher in the cesarean section group, whereas favorable outcomes were more commonly observed in the vaginal delivery group. Conclusion:
Normal vaginal delivery is associated with better maternal recovery and neonatal outcomes compared to cesarean section. Cesarean section should be reserved for appropriate medical indications to minimize unnecessary complications and improve overall maternal and fetal health outcomes.
Keywords
Normal Vaginal Delivery. Cesarean Section. Maternal and Fetal Outcomes
Copyright
Copyright © Neuroquantology
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Neuroquantology are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IJECSE right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.