DOI: 10.14704/nq.2016.14.2.950

Speculation on Shaktipat as “Spooky Action at a Distance”

Juan J. Rios

Abstract


This paper is a speculative inquiry into the operation of the mechanism for conferring shaktipat over a distance that may be an example at the human level of what physicist Albert Einstein termed “spooky action at a distance.” The spooky action referred to by Einstein is the transmission of information between two objects in a reality outside space and time that occurs in the non-classical world of quantum mechanics. This paper does not explain the mechanism by which “spooky action at a distance” works. The evidence presented in this paper only points towards the potential conclusion that a mechanism may exist for transmitting the effects of human intention like shaktipat onto living systems that is consistent with “spooky action at a distance.”

Keywords


shaktipat; entanglement; guru; Siddha Yoga; intention

Full Text:

Full Text PDF

References


Achterberg J, Cooke K, Richards T, Standish LJ, Kozak L and Lake J. Evidence for correlations between

distant intentionality and brain function in recipients: A functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine: Research on Paradigm, Practice, and Policy 2005; 11(6): 965-971.

Anderson R and Braud W. Transpersonal research and future directions. In H. L. Friedman and G. Hartelius (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of transpersonal psychology. Wiley-Blackwell: Malden, MA, 2013: 239-260.

Bell JS. On the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen paradox. Physics 1964; 1(3): 195-200.

Bell JS. Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics: Collected papers on quantum philosophy. Cambridge university press 2004: 144.

Bem D, Tressoldi P, Rabeyron T and Duggan M. Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments

on the anomalous anticipation of random future events [version 1; referees: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2015; 4:1188 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7177.1)

Bernstein J. Max Born and the quantum theory. American journal of physics 2005; 73(11):999-1008.

Born Einstein Letters. (1916/1955). Retrieved from: http://www.archive.org/stream/TheBornEinsteinLetters/Born-TheBornEinsteinLetters_djvu.txt

Burke RC, Gauthier MY, Rouleau N and Persinger MA. Experimental demonstration of potential entanglement of brain activity over 300 Km for pairs of subjects sharing the same circular rotating, angular accelerating Magnetic fields: verification by sLORETA, QEEG measurements. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research 2013; 4(1): 35-44.

Cramer JG. Quantum nonlocality and the possibility of superluminal effects. Proceedings of the NASA breakthrough propulsion physics workshop: Cleveland, OH, 1997: 12-14.

de Peyer J. Telepathic Entanglements: Where are we Today? Commentary on Paper by Claudie Massicotte. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 2014; 24(1): 109-121.

Einstein A, Podolsky B and Rosen N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical review 1935; 47(10): 777-780.

Ferrer J. Participation, metaphysics, and enlightenment: Reflections on Ken Wilber’s recent work. Transpersonal Psychology Review 2011; 14(2): 3-24.

Feynman RP. Simulating physics with computers. International journal of theoretical Physics 1982; 21(6/7): 467-488.

Gershenfeld, N and Chuang I. Quantum computing with molecules. Scientific American 1998; 6: 66-71.

Grinberg-Zylberbaum J, Delaflor M, Attie L and Goswami A. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in the brain: The transferred potential. Physics Essays 1994; 7: 422-428.

Grof S. Brief history of transpersonal psychology. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 2008; 27: 46-54.

Grof S. Implications of modern consciousness research for psychology: Holotropic experiences and their healing and heuristic potential. The Humanistic Psychologist 2003; 31(2-3): 50-85.

Hewitt MA. Freud and the Psychoanalysis of Telepathy: Commentary on Claudie Massicotte’s “Psychical Transmissions.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 2014; 24(1): 103-108.

Hu H and Wu M. Thinking outside the box: the essence and implications of quantum entanglement and the story of spin-mediated consciousness theory. NeuroQuantology 2007; 4(1): 5-16.

Hu H and Wu M. Transatlantic Excess Brain Correlations Are Experimentally Produced by Persinger’s Group. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research 2015; 6(9): 750-755.

Josephson BD and Pallikari-Viras F. Biological utilization of quantum nonlocality. Foundations of Physics 1991; 21(2): 197-207.

Keller C. The Entangled Cosmos: an experiment in physical theopoetics. Journal of Cosmology 2012; 20: 8648-8666. Retrieved from: http://sdcc3.ucsd.edu/~ir118/JOC20/Keller1%201.pdf.

Lake J. Toward a model of consciousness: philosophical problems and questions guiding a way forward. Journal of Nonlocality 2014; 3(1). Retrieved from: http://journals.sfu.ca/jnonlocality/index.php/jnonlocality/article/view/52

Laszlo E. The Akashic experience: Science and the cosmic memory field. Inner Traditions: Rochester, Vermont 2009: 166-167.

Lee KC, Sprague MR, Sussman BJ, Nunn J, Langford NK, Jin XM and Walmsley IA. Entangling macroscopic diamonds at room temperature. Science 2011; 334(6060): 1253-1256.

Leder D. Spooky Actions at a Distance: Physics, Psi, and Distant Healing. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 2005; 11(5): 923-930.

Marin JM. Mysticism in quantum mechanics: the forgotten controversy. European Journal of Physics 2009; 30(4): 807-822.

Maudlin T. What Bell did. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 2014; 47(42): 1-25.

Mermin ND. Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory. Physics Today 1985; 38(4): 38-47.

Persinger website. (n.d.). https://neurocogconsultants.app.box.com/s/l9f7tld3yjny4b00eqbq

Persinger MA and Lavallee CF. Theoretical and experimental evidence of macroscopic entanglement between human brain activity and photon emissions: Implications for quantum consciousness and future applications. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research 2010; 1(7): 785-807.

Plenio MB and Vedral V. Teleportation, entanglement and thermodynamics in the quantum world. Contemporary physics 1998; 39(6): 431-446.

Radin D, Stone J, Levine E, Eskandarnejad S, Schlitz M, Kozak L and Hayssen G. Compassionate intention as a therapeutic intervention by partners of cancer patients: Effects of distant intention on the patients' autonomic nervous system. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing 2008; 4(4): 235-243.

Radin D. Entangled minds: Extrasensory experiences in a quantum reality. Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, 2009.

Radin D, Schlitz M and Baur C. Distant Healing Intention therapies: An overview of the scientific evidence. Global Advances in Health and Medicine 2015; 4: 67-71.

Richards TL, Kozak L, Johnson LC and Standish LJ. Replicable functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence of correlated brain signals between physically and sensory isolated subjects. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine: Research on Paradigm, Practice, and Policy 2005; 11(6): 955-963.

Salart D, Baas A, Branciard C, Gisin N and Zbinden H. Testing the speed of spooky action at a distance. Nature 2008; 454(7206): 861-864.

Sanders L. Everyday entanglement: Physicists take quantum weirdness out of the lab. Science News 2010. Retrieved from: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/everyday-entanglement.

Schlitz M, Radin D, Malle BF, Schmidt S, Utts J and Yount GL. Distant healing intention: Definitions and evolving guidelines for laboratory studies. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 2003; 9(3): A31-A43.

Schmidt S. Can we help just by good intentions? A meta-analysis of experiments on distant intention effects. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 2012; 18(6): 529-533.

Scott MA, Rouleau N, Lehman BS, Tessaro LW, Juden-Kelly LM, Saroka KS and Persinger MA. Experimental Production of Excess Correlation across the Atlantic Ocean of Right Hemispheric Theta-Gamma Power between Subject Pairs Sharing Circumcerebral Rotating Magnetic Fields (Part I). Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research 2015; 6(9): 658-684.

Smith AL and Tart CT. Cosmic consciousness experience and psychedelic experiences: A first person comparison. Journal of Consciousness Studies 1998; 5(1): 97-107.

Tarlacı S, Pregnolato M. Quantum neurophysics: From non-living matter to quantum neurobiology and psychopathology. Int J Psychophysiol 2015 Feb 7. pii: S0167-8760(15)00046-X. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.016.

Vedral V. Living in a quantum world. Scientific American 2011; 304(6): 38-43.

Ventura AC, Saroka, KS and Persinger, MA. Non-Locality changes in intercerebral theta band coherence between practitioners and subjects during distant Reiki procedures. Journal of Nonlocality 2014; 3(1): 1-25.

Walach H. Criticisms of transpersonal psychology and beyond-The future of Transpersonal psychology: A science and culture of consciousness. In H. L. Friedman & G. Hartelius (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of transpersonal psychology. Wiley-Blackwell: Malden, MA, 2013: 62-87.

Waldron J. The life impact of transcendent experiences with a pronounced quality of noesis. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 1998; 30(2): 103-134.

Witze A. 75 Years of Entanglement. Science News 2010; 178(11). Retrieved from: https://www.sciencenews.org/article/75-years-entanglement.


Supporting Agencies

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.



| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2018