DOI: 10.14704/nq.2016.14.3.885

Concentric and Diametric Spatial Structures of Relation: Exploring a Neutral Bridge Language between Quantum Physics and Neuropsychology

Paul Downes

Abstract


Pauli (1949) postulated a neutral bridge language between the physical and psychological world but left this idea underdeveloped. This article proposes a candidate neutral bridge language between quantum physics and neuropsychology in terms of specific contrasting spaces, concentric and diametric spaces. Concentric and diametric spaces are explored in terms of symmetry, assumed connection and separation, as well as relatively open and closed systems of foreground-background interaction. Structural commonalities are highlighted between these concentric and diametric spaces and aspects of quantum physics, such as Pauli’s Exclusion Principle and antiparticles, as well as in neuropsychology, for mirror neurons. Such structural commonalities are not to reduce this proposed spatial-phenomenological bridge language to either the quantum physical or neuropsychological level.

Keywords


concentric space; diametric space; symmetry; quantum physics; Pauli exclusion principle; antiparticle; mirror neurons

Full Text:

Full Text PDF

References


Barrow JD & Tipler FJ. The anthropic cosmological principle. Oxford University Press., 1986.

Barrow JD. Theories of everything: The quest for ultimate explanation. Oxford University Press: Vintage Edition, 1992.

Bohm D. Wholeness and the implicate order, 1980. London: Ark, 1983

Berlin HA. The neural basis of the dynamic unconscious. Neuropsychoanalysis 2011; 13: 5-31

Bricmont J. Science of Chaos or Chaos in Science. To appear in Physicalia Magazine, and in the Proceedings of the New York Academy of Science, 1996.

Bricmont J. & Sokal, A. Defense of a modest scientific realism. Talk given by Alan Sokal at the Bielefeld-ZiF conference on “Welt und Wissen – Monde et Savoir – World and Knowledge” 18 June 2001, Final Revision 23 September 2001

Coveney P. & Highfield, R. The arrow of time. London: Flamingo, 1991.

Damasio RD. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. NY: Grosset / Putnam Books, 1994.

Denis KL. Quantum consciousness: Reconciling science and spirituality toward our evolutionary future(s). Word Futures 2010; 66: 511-524.

Descartes R. Descartes: Philosophical writings. Trans. by E. Anscombe & P.T. Geach. London: Nelson., 1954.

Di Pellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V and Rizzolatti G. Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research 1992; 91: 176-180.

Downes P. Cross-cultural structures of concentric and diametric dualism in Levi-Strauss’ structural anthropology: Structures of relation underlying the self and ego relation? Journal of Analytical Psychology 2003; 48:47-81

Downes P. Newtonian space: The ‘blind spot’ in Newell and Simon’s information processing paradigm. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 2006; 13(3):25-55.

Downes P. Schema structure-content relativity: Part I, Deconstructing the absolute space assumptions underlying the schema concept founding cognitive science Cybernetics and Human Knowing 2010a; 17(3):7-25.

Downes P. Schema structure-content relativity: Part II, From image schemata to background spatial schemata of diametric and concentric relation. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 2010b; 17(3):25-43.

Downes P. Newtonian Space in Newell and Simon: Reply to Kinsella’s (2008) response to Downes (2006). Cybernetics and Human Knowing 2010c; 17(1):191-200.

Downes P. Concentric and diametric structures in yin/yang and the mandala symbol: A new wave of Eastern frames for psychology. Psychology and Developing Societies 2011; 23:121-153.

Downes P. The Primordial Dance: Diametric and Concentric Spaces in the Unconscious World. Oxford/Bern: Peter Lang., 2012.

Downes P. Developing Derrida’s psychoanalytic graphology: Diametric and concentric spatial movements. Derrida Today 2013; 6: 197-221.

Downes P. Diametric and Concentric Spatial Structures Framing Belief Systems. Cybernetics and Systems 2015; 46:510-524.

Downes P. Developing a framework of system change between diametric and concentric spaces for early school leaving prevention 2015a. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Published online: 22 Sep 2015.

Fodor JA The language of thought. Hassocks: Harvester Press.,1976.

Gash H. A spatial-phenomenological lens to examine psychological and philosophical issues in thinking. Cybernetics and Systems 2015; 46: 525-527.

Gillespie MA. Hegel, Heidegger and the ground of history. University of Chicago Press., 1984.

Hameroff SR. A new theory of the origin of cancer: quantum coherent entanglement, centrioles, mitosis and differentiation. Biosystems 2004; 77:119-136.

Hawking S. Black holes and baby universes and other essays. London: Bantam Press., 1993.

Hofstadter DR. Godel, Escher, Bach: An eternal golden braid. New York: Basic Books., 1979.

Hyland ME. A brief guide to extended network entanglement theory as a theory of healing and its empirical predictions. Research in Complementary and Classical Natural Medicine 2003; 10: 201-206.

Hyland ME. Emergent, entanglement, love and being. Journal of Holistic Healthcare 2004; 1: 24-29.

Jung CG. The psychology of Eastern meditation. In C.G. Jung Psychology and Religion: West and East. CW. 11., 1943.

Keysers C. Mirror Neurons. Current Biology 2010; 19 (21): R971–973.

Lévi-Strauss C. The savage mind, 1962. Trans. by G. Weidenfeld. Nicolson Ltd., 1966.

Lévi-Strauss C. Structural anthropology: Vol.1 Trans. by C.Jacobsen & B.Grundfe¬st

Schoepf. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press., 1963.

Lévi-Strauss C. Structural anthropology: Vol.2 Trans. by M.Layton 1977 Allen Lane: Penguin Books., 1973.

Limar IV. Carl G. Jung’s synchronicity and quantum entanglement: Schrodinger’s cat ‘wanders’ between chromosomes. NeuroQuantology 2011; 9: 313-321.

Mansfield V. & Spiegelman JM. The opposites in quantum physics and Jungian psychology. Part 1: Theoretical foundations. Journal of Analytical Psychology 1991-1992; 36-37: 267-288.

Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley J. Is the mirror neuron system involved in imitation? A short review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2009; 33: 975–980.

Newell A. & Simon HA Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 1972.

Nisbett RE, Peng K, Choi I, and Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review 2001; 108: 291–310.

Pais A. Subtle is the Lord. The science and life of Albert Einstein. Oxford University Press., 1982.

Pauli W. Atom and archetype: The Pauli-Jung letters 1932-1958 (C.A. Meier, ed. 2001), Trans. by D. Roscoe. London: Routledge, 2001.

Peat FD. Superstrings and the search for theory of everything. Contemporary Books, 1988.

Penrose R. The emperor’s new mind, 1990. London: Vintage

Penrose R. Shadows of the mind: A search for the missing science of consciousness. London: Vintage, 1995.

Piaget J and Inhelder B. The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul., 1956.

Rizzolatti G and Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2004; 27: 169-192.

Sokal A and Bricmont J. Intellectual impostures: Postmodern philosophers’ abuse of science. London: Profile Books., 1999.

Simon HA. The sciences of the artificial. 3rd ed., Cambridge MIT Press., 1996.

Taric S, Kazim R and Tauqir I. Could human mind be a product of mental genes: a nonbiological component of brain genes? NeuroQuantology 2010; 8: 359-377.

Tulub AA. Coherent triplet and singlet states in tubulin dynamics. Future Generation Computer Systems 2004; 20: 773-780.

Von Eckhardt B. What is cognitive science? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., 1993.

Wallace D. Everett and structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2003; 34: 87-105.

Weinberg S. Dreams of a final theory: The search for the fundamental laws of nature. London: Vintage., 1993.

Weinberg S. Sokal's Hoax. New York Review of Books, August 8, 1996.

Zabriskie B. Introduction, Jung and Pauli: A meeting of rare minds. In C.A. Meier. Atom and archetype: The Pauli-Jung letters 1932-1958. Trans. by D. Roscoe. London: Routledge., 2001.


Supporting Agencies

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.



| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2017