DOI: 10.14704/nq.2015.13.1.801

Modeling and Measurement of Interpersonal Attraction and Coordination in Charged Social Space-Time

Alan S. Haas

Abstract


A new interpretation of consciousness proposes that states of the mind and behavior may be treated as containing a net electrochemical charge. In the electrodynamic model, interpersonal interactions would exhibit attraction due to complementarily charged states. While this hypothesis remains to be verified with neuroimaging and other techniques, it is important to consider how psychology would in principle be described using charges in social space time. Extended analysis of data from a recently developed method is used to demonstrate how this would occur during optimally coordinated cognitive behavioral activity, or interpersonal “synchronicity.” In an earlier study, pairs of individuals were asked to converse for an initial period, separate, and return to talk again after making a decision about when they were ready to meet for a second conversation with their partner. In addition to the beneficial effects of mindfulness that optimized subsequent interactions, participants with similar personality traits also appeared to be aligned and returned with greater simultaneous coordination. The interaction of pairs in the study may be considered to resemble coupled particles in an EPR experiment, and is used to show how complementary simultaneous coordination can be understood within the context of “charged social space time.” Synchronistic moments of meeting are treated as coherent charge states that converge under effective conditions after an interval of time. The implication is that interpersonal attraction and bonding may create social structures that are uniquely described by fundamental electrodynamic principles. The nature of consciousness and social behavior may require a model using charge like reactions that progress as a function of biophysical energy, space, and time. Here, a method and principles for the development of a practical model of electrodynamic consciousness is detailed.

Keywords


brain charge; electrodynamic; electrochemical brain; interpersonal attraction; coordination dynamics

Full Text:

Full Text PDF

References


Cambray J. Synchronicity and emergence. American Imago 2002; 59: 409 434.

Donnellan MB, Oswald FL, Baird BM, Lucas RE. The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment 2006; 18: 192 203.

Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N. Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be complete? Physical Review 1935; 47: 777-780.

Freud S. The interpretation of dreams. Leipzig and Vienna: Franz Deuticke, 1899.

Haas AS. On a physical scientific approach to transpersonal psychology. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies 2011a; 30: 69-81.

Haas AS. The interpretation of telepathy like effects: A novel electromagnetic and synchronistic version of the psychoanalytic model. NeuroQuantology 2011b; 9: 22-35.

Haas AS. The discovery of quantum tunneling in biological electron transfer and the possibility of a redox like mechanism of the mind: A retrospective. NeuroQuantology 2011c; 9: 415 418.

Haas AS. The nature of the relation between psychology and physics: An argument for a central role of electromagnetism in thought and behavior. NeuroQuantology 2011d; 9: 892 909.

Haas AS. A brain charge mechanism modeled in synchronistic dyadic interpersonal interaction. NeuroQuantology 2012a; 10: 482-488.

Haas AS. The effects of mindfulness on interpersonal synchronization and attraction. Harvard University ALM Thesis 2012b.

Haas AS and Langer EJ. Mindful attraction and synchronization: Mindfulness and regulation of interpersonal synchronicity. NeuroQuantology 2014; 12: 21 34.

Hogenson GB. Synchronicity and moments of meeting. Journal of Analytical Psychology 2009; 54: 183-197.

Jung CG. The interpretation of nature and the psyche. Synchronicity: an acausal connecting principle. Pantheon Books, New York, 1955.

Kelso JAS and Engstrom DA. The complementary nature. Cambridge, MA, MIT press, 2006.

Lerner Y, Honey CJ, Silbert LJ, Hasson U. Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story. Journal of Neuroscience 2011; 31: 2906 2915.

Nevin JA and Grace RC. Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000; 23: 73 130.

Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder A, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2001; 98: 676 682.

Schore AN. Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994.

Sheldrake R. A new science of life: The hypothesis of morphic resonance. Los Angeles, CA, J. P. Harcher, 1981.

Stephens GJ, Silbert LJ, Hasson U. Speaker listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2010; 107: 14425 14430.


Supporting Agencies

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.



| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2018