DOI: 10.14704/nq.2014.12.4.741

Some Vital and Unrecognized Roles of Attention in Quantum Theories of Consciousness

Yan Jiang, Ravi Prakash

Abstract


As the quantum models of consciousness are becoming more and more prominent for theoretical models of consciousness, more dimensions of consciousness are being discovered. At the same time, the need to pin-point the element of consciousness is becoming more and more important. Parallal to these researches, several cognitive models of consciousness have also been propounded. With more and more results of cognitive studies, we are coming to know that like consciousness, attention is also a basic function of human psychology and both are very intricately related to each other, some- times even overlapping with each other. Perhaps this has been the reason either the cognitive functions of attention have been completely over-looked or have been mistakenly used synonymously with consciousness in the theories of the latter. This is especially true for QM theories of consciousness. Because of not taking attention into account, some of the most basic assumptions of QM models of consciousness have been erroneous. In this article, we review the literature of basic theories of QM and at the same time, we will see that several important roles of attention in these theories are missing. This is because in most of the theories, attention has either been completely ignored or has been confused with consciousness, where as both are two distinct cognitive functions. In this preliminary exploration, we will try to address three basic issues on QM in relation to consciousness: 1)The measurement problem 2) The quantum reduction or wave function collapse and 3) The free choice of consciousness. We propose that future models of consciousness should take into account the vitality of understanding attention.

Keywords


Quantum mechanics; Consciousness; Attention

Full Text:

Full Text PDF

References


Asplund CL, Fougnie D, Zughni S, Martin JW, Marois R. The Attentional Blink Reveals the Probabilistic Nature of Discrete Conscious Perception. Psychol Sci 2014; 25(3):824-31.

Bender MB. Disorders of perception. Charles C. Thomas. Springfield. IL, 1952.

Bierman DJ and Whitmarsh S. Consciousness and Quantum Physics: Empirical Research on the Subjective Reduction of the State vector. The Emerging Physics of Consciousness Ed. Jack A. Tuszynski (Ed). Springer, 2006. pp.27-48.

Bohr N. Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. Wiley. New York, 1958.

Boughn S, Reginatto M. A pedestrian approach to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. The European Physical Journal 2013; 38(4): 443-470.

Dicsi L. Models for universal reduction of macroscopic quantum fluctuations. Phys Rev A 1989; 40: 1165–1174.

Driver J, Mattingley JB, Rorden C and Davis G. Extinction as a paradigm measure of attentional bias and restricted capacity following brain injury. In. P. Thier & H.-O. Karnath (Eds.), Parietal Lobe Contributions to Orientation in 3D Space (pp. 401-430). Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg, 1997.

Driver J. A selective review of selective attention research from the past century. British Journal of Psychology 2001; 92: 53–78.

Folk CL, Remington RW and Johnston JC. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992; 18:1030–1044.

Ghirardi GC, Rimini A and Weber T. Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Phys Rev D 1986; 34:470.

Gopher D, Weil M and Bareket T. Transfer of skill from a computer game trainer to flight. Human Factors 1994; 36(3): 387-405.

Gopher D. The skill of attentional control: Acquisition and execution of attention strategies. Attention and performance, XIV. MIT Press Cambridge, MA, USA, 1993, pp.299-322.

Hameroff S and Penrose R. Consciousness in the universe: A review of the 'Orch OR' theory. Phys Life Rev 2014; 11(1):39-78.

Hameroff S and Penrose R. Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: a model for consciousness. In: Hameroff SR, Kaszniak AW, Scott AC, editors. Toward a science of consciousness; the first Tucson discussions and debates. MIT Press; Cambridge, 1996, pp.507–40.

Hameroff S. How quantum brain biology can rescue conscious free-will. Front Integr Neurosci 2012; 6:93.

Ibison M and Jeffers S. A double slit experiment to investigate claims of consciousness-related anomalies. Journal of Scientific Exploration 1998; 12(4): 543-550.

James W. The Principles of Psychology, Vol. I. Dover. New York, 1890.

Károlyházy F, Frenkel A and Lukacs B. On the possible role of gravity on the reduction of the wave function, in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, Eds Penrose R, Isham CJ. Editors. NY: Oxford University Press. New York, 1986, p.109–128.

Kim YH, Yu R, Kulik SP, Shih YH and Scully M. A delayed choice quantum eraser. Phys Rev Lett 2000; 84: 1–5.

Koch C and Hepp K. Quantum Mechanics in the Brain. Nature 2006; 440: 611-612.

Koch C and Tsuchiya N. Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11(1):16-22.

Lamme VAF. Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; a case for phenomenal awareness. Neural Networks 2004; 17:861–872.

Libet B. Do We Have Free Will? Journal of Consciousness Studies 1999; 6(8-9): 47-57.

McDowd JM and Craik FI. Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1988; 14(2):267-280.

Meyer E and Kornblum S (Eds.), Attention and Performance. MA: MIT Press. Vol. XIV. Cambridge, 1993, pp.299-322.

Nakamura K, Oga T, Fukuyama H. Task-sensitivity of unconscious word processing in spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 2012; 50(7):1570-7.

Pashler H. The Psychology of Attention. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999.

Penrose R. Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. NY: Oxford University Press. New York, 1994.

Penrose R. The Emperor's New Mind., NY: Oxford University Press. New York, 1989.

Polich J and Criado JR. Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. Int J Psychophysiol 2006; 60:172-185.

Posner MI and Petersen SE. The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 1990; 13: 25-42.

Posner MI. Attention: The mechanisms of consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 7398-7403.

Radin D, Michel L, Galdamez K, Wendland P, Rickenbach R and Delorme A. Consciousness and the double-slit interference pattern: Six experiments. Physics Essays 2012; 25(2):157-171.

Radin D, Michel L, Johnston J and Delorme A. Psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern. Physics Essays 2013; 26(4):553-566.

Schlosshauer M and Camilleri K. The quantum-to-classical transition: Bohr’s doctrine of classical concepts, emergent classicality, and decoherence, e-print arXiv:0804.1609 [quant-ph], 2008.

Schwartz JM, Stapp HP and Beauregard M. Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind–brain interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005; 360(1458):1309-27.

Stapp HP. Mind, Matter and Quantum Mechanics. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1993.

Tallon-Baudry C. On the Neural Mechanisms Subserving Consciousness and Attention. Front Psychol 2011; 2: 397.

Theeuwes J. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Percept Psychophys 1991; 50: 184–193.

Treisman AM and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol 1980; 12:97–136.

Von Neumann J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Translated by Robert T. Beyer from the 34 1932 German original, Mathematiche Grundlagen der Quantummechanik.: J. Springer. Berlin, 1955.

Ward R, Goodrich S and Driver J. Grouping reduces visual extinction. Visual Cognition 1994; 1: 101-129.

Wegner D M. The Illusion of Conscious Will. MA: MIT Press; Cambridge, 2002.

Wheeler JA Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory., NY: (Ed. Marlow, A.R.) Academic Press, New York. 1978, pp.9-48.

Williams LJ. Tunnel vision or general interference? Cognitive load and attentional bias are both important. American Journal of Psychology 1988; 101:171-191.

Williams LJ. Foveal load affects the functional Field of view. Human Performance 1989; 2: 1-28.

Yeshurun Y, Kimchi R, Sha'shoua G, Carmel T. Perceptual objects capture attention. Vision Res 2009; 49:1329-1335.


Supporting Agencies

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.



| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019