DOI: 10.14704/nq.2019.17.1.1919

Suppression in Metaphor Comprehension: A Perspective From Distributed Models of Conceptual Representation

Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Hassan Banaruee, Babak Yazdani-Fazlabadi

Abstract


This article looks at the process of suppression in metaphor comprehension from the perspective of distributed models of conceptual representation. The aim is to present a picture of what happens during the process of suppression in metaphor comprehension. It is suggested that the process of suppression could take place differently depending on whether vehicle of metaphor is a living or nonliving thing. This difference is the result of differences between the nature of correlations among features in living and nonliving things. Then, a comparison is made between the ways that living and nonliving things function in the vehicle position of metaphors. It is proposed that the three factors of visual features, functional features, and strength of correlation among distinctive features of vehicle play a role in this regard. It is proposed that a visual-oriented mode of processing becomes dominant when a living thing is used in the vehicle position of metaphor. For those metaphors which use a nonliving thing in the vehicle position, functional features of vehicle play a key role in the understanding of metaphor. Finally, the strength of correlation among distinctive features in nonliving things is a key factor for those metaphors that use a nonliving thing in the vehicle position. In these metaphors, the set of distinctive features is the defining set of metaphorical class.

Keywords


Suppression, Metaphor comprehension, Distributed models, Distinctive features

Full Text:

PDF

References


Banaruee H, Khoshsima H, Khatin-Zadeh O, Askari A. Suppression of semantic features in metaphor comprehension. Cogent Psychology 2017; 4: 140932.

Caramazza A and Mahon BZ. The organization of conceptual knowledge: The evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends on Cognitive Sciences 2003; 7: 325–374.

Caramazza A and Mahon BZ. The organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain: The future’s past and some future directions. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005; 22: 1–25.

Caramazza A and Shelton JR. Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate–inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998; 10: 1–34.

Cree GS, McNorgan C, McRae K. Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for 724 COMMENTARY theories of semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006; 32: 643–658.

Devereux BJ, Taylor KI, Randall B, Geertzen J, Tyler LK. Feature statistics modulate the activation of meaning during spoken word processing. Cognitive Science 2016; 40: 325-350.

Devlin JT, Gonnerman LM, Andersen ES, Seidenberg MS. Category-specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: A computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998; 10: 77–94.

Durrant-Peatfield M, Tyler LK, Moss HE, Levy J. The distinctiveness of form and function in category structure: A connectionist model. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the nineteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum 1997; pp. 193–198.

Gallese V and Lakoff G. The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005; 22: 455-479.

Gernsbacher MA and Robertson RW. The role of suppression in figurative language comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics 1999; 31: 1619–1630.

Glucksberg S, Newsome MR, Goldvarg Y. Inhibition of the literal: Filtering metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension. Metaphor & Symbol 2001; 16: 277–298.

Gonnerman LM, Andersen ES, Devlin JT, Kempler D, Seidenberg MS. Double dissociation of semantic categories in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language 1997; 57: 254–279.

Greer M, van Casteren M, McClellan S, Moss HE, Rodd J, Rogers T, Tyler LK. The emergence of semantic categories from distributed featural representations. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2001.

Keysar B. Discourse context effects: Metaphorical and literal interpretations. Discourse Processes 1994; 18: 247–269.

Khatin-Zadeh O and Vahdat S. Abstract and concrete representation in structure-mapping and class-inclusion. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 2015; 2: 349–360.

Martin A and Chao LL. Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2001; 11: 194–201.

Martin A, Ungerleider LG, Haxby JV. Category-specificity and the brain: The sensory–motor model of semantic representations of objects. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press 2000; pp. 1023–1036.

Moss HE, Tyler LK, Jennings F. When leopards lose their spots: Knowledge of visual properties in category-specific deficits for living things. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1997; 14: 901–50.

Moss HE, Tyler LK, Taylor KI. Conceptual Structure. In Gaskell, G., editor. Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, Oxford University Press: Oxford 2007; pp. 217-234.

Randall B, Moss HE, Rodd JM, Greer M, Tyler LK. Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structure: Behavioral and computational studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004; 30: 393–406.

Taylor KI, Devereux BJ, Tyler LK. Conceptual structure: Towards an integrated neurocognitive account. Language and Cognitive Processes 2011; 26: 1368-1401.

Taylor KI, Salamoura A, Randall B, Moss HE, Tyler LK. Clarifying the nature of distinctiveness by domain interaction in conceptual structure: A comment on Cree 2008; McNorgan and McRae. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2006; 34: 719–25.

Tyler LK and Moss HE. Functional properties of concepts: studies of normal and brain-damaged patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1997; 14: 511–45.

Tyler L K, Moss HE, Durrant-Peatfield MR, Levy JP. Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language 2000; 75: 195–231.

Warrington EK and McCarthy R. Category-specific access dysphasia. Brain 1983; 106: 859–878.

Warrington EK and McCarthy R. Categories of knowledge: Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 1987; 110: 1273–1296.

Warrington EK and Shallice T. Category-specific semantic impairment. Brain 1984; 107: 829–853.


Supporting Agencies





| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019