DOI: 10.14704/nq.2018.16.4.1219

Origin of Quantum Mechanical Results and Life: A Clue from Quantum Biology

Biswaranjan Dikshit


Although quantum mechanics can accurately predict the probability distribution of outcomes in an ensemble of identical systems, it cannot predict the result of an individual system. All the local and global hidden variable theories attempting to explain individual behavior have been proved invalid by experiments (violation of Bell’s inequality) and theory. As an alternative, Schrodinger and others have hypothesized existence of free will in every particle which causes randomness in individual results. However, these free will theories have failed to quantitatively explain the quantum mechanical results. In this paper, we take the clue from quantum biology to get the explanation of quantum mechanical distribution. Recently it was reported that mutations (which are quantum processes) in DNA of E. coli bacteria instead of being random were biased in a direction such that the chance of survival of the bacteria is increased. Extrapolating it, we assume that all the particles including inanimate fundamental particles have a will and that is biased to satisfy the collective goals of the ensemble. Using this postulate, we mathematically derive the correct spin probability distribution without using quantum mechanical formalism (operators and Born’s rule) and exactly reproduce the quantum mechanical spin correlation in entangled pairs. Using our concept, we also mathematically derive the form of quantum mechanical wave function of free particle which is conventionally a postulate of quantum mechanics. Thus, we prove that the origin of quantum mechanical results lies in the will (or consciousness) of the objects biased by the collective goal of ensemble or universe. This biasing by the group on individuals can be called as “coherence” which directly represents the extent of life present in the ensemble. So, we can say that life originates out of establishment of coherence in a group of inanimate particles.


Quantum biology, Biased will, Consciousness, Non-locality, Quantum entanglement

Full Text:



Aspect A, Grangier P, Roger G. Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: a new violation of Bell's inequalities. Physical Review Letters 1982; 49(2):91-94.

Aspect A, Dalibard J, Roger G. Experimental test of Bell's inequalities using time-varying analyzers. Physical Review Letters. 1982; 49(25):1804-07.

Aspect A. Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever. Nature 1999;398(6724):189-90.

Beiser A. Perspectives of modern Physics, Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1987

Bell JS. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics, 1964; 1(3):195-200.

Bohm D. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of" hidden" variables. I. Physical Review 1952; 85(2):166-79.

Colbeck R, Renner R. No extension of quantum theory can have improved predictive power. Nature communications 2011; 2 (411): 1-5.

Conway J, Kochen S. The free will theorem. Foundations of Physics 2006; 36(10):1441-73.

Conway J, Kochen S. The strong free will theorem. Notices of the AMS 2009; 56(2):226-32.

Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physical Review 1935;47(10):777-80.

Gisin N. Impossibility of covariant deterministic nonlocal hidden-variable extensions of quantum theory. Physical Review A 2011; 83(2):020102.

Goldstein S, Tausk DV, Tumulka R, Zanghì N. What does the free will theorem actually prove. Notices of the AMS 2010; 57(11):1451-53.

Gröblacher S, Paterek T, Kaltenbaek R, Brukner Č, Żukowski M, Aspelmeyer M, Zeilinger A. An experimental test of non-local realism. Nature 2007; 446(7138):871-75.

Hameroff SR. A new theory of the origin of cancer: quantum coherent entanglement, centrioles, mitosis, and differentiation. Biosystems 2004;77(1-3):119-36.

Hameroff S, Penrose R. Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’theory. Physics of Life Reviews 2014; 11(1):39-78.

Josephson BD, Pallikari-Viras F. Biological utilization of quantum nonlocality. Foundations of Physics 1991; 21(2):197-207.

Lambert N, Chen YN, Cheng YC, Li CM, Chen GY, Nori F. Quantum biology. Nature Physics 2013; 9(1):10-18.

Leggett AJ. Nonlocal hidden-variable theories and quantum mechanics: An incompatibility theorem. Foundations of Physics 2003; 33(10):1469-93.

Genovese M. Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses. Physics Reports 2005; 413(6):319-96.

McFadden J, Al-Khalili J. A quantum mechanical model of adaptive mutation. Biosystems 1999; 50(3):203-11.

Merali Z. Quantum mechanics braces for the ultimate test. Science 2011; 331:1380-82.

Merali Z. Solving Biology's Mysteries Using Quantum Mechanics. Discover 2014; December 29, ( )

Ou ZY, Mandel L. Violation of Bell's inequality and classical probability in a two-photon correlation experiment. Physical Review Letters 1988; 61(1):50-53.

Paterek T, Fedrizzi A, Gröblacher S, Jennewein T, Żukowski M, Aspelmeyer M, Zeilinger A. Experimental test of nonlocal realistic theories without the rotational symmetry assumption. Physical Review Letters 2007; 99(21):210406.

Schrödinger E. Indeterminism and free will. Nature 1936; 138: 13-14.

Shih YH, Alley CO. New type of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment using pairs of light quanta produced by optical parametric down conversion. Physical Review Letters 1988; 61(26):2921-24.

Stapp HP. Mind, matter, and quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics 1982; 12(4):363-99.

Tittel W, Brendel J, Zbinden H, Gisin N. Violation of Bell inequalities by photons more than 10 km apart. Physical Review Letters 1998; 81(17):3563-66.

Vedral V. Quantifying entanglement in macroscopic systems. Natur. 2008; 453(7198):1004-07.

Weihs G, Jennewein T, Simon C, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A. Violation of Bell's inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Physical Review Letters 1998; 81(23):5039-43.

Supporting Agencies

| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019