DOI: 10.14704/nq.2017.15.3.1099

Spatial Information is Exploited to Adjust Hand Movement When Hitting Moving Target

Rixin Tang, Zhijun Zhang, Yuli Liu, Zhipeng Wang

Abstract


When hitting a moving target, hand movement has to be adjusted according to online information. But it is not clear whether other information would be the used if temporal information has been provided to direct the interception action of hand. This study investigated how the kinematics of interception movement were affected by moving target in different conditions. Three kinds of targets including stationary, uniform motion and accelerated motion were hit by participants. The result reveals that although three tasks are performed within the same time, the hand movements are significantly different. This suggests that in addition to temporal information, spatial information also plays an important role in the motor control during interception.

Keywords


Interception, Time to Contact, Spatial Information, Temporal Information

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andersen GJ and Kim RD. Perceptual information and attentional constraints in visual search of collision events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and performance 2001;27: 1039-1056.

Bastin J and Montagne G. The perceptual support of goal-directed displacement is context-dependent. Neuroscience Letters 2005; 376: 121-126.

Benguigui N, Ripoll H, Broderick MP. Time-to-contact estimation of accelerated stimuli is based on first-order information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003; 29(6):1083-1101.

Brenner E and Smeets JBJ. Flexibility in intercepting moving objects. Journal of Vision 2007; 7(5): 1–17.

Brenner E and Smeets JBJ. Sources of variability in interceptive movements. Experimental Brain Research 2009; 195: 117-133.

Caljouw SR, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP. Timing of goal-directed hitting: impact requirements change the information–movement coupling. Experimental Brain Research 2004; 155:135–144.

Chieffi S, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Gentilucci M. Prehension movements directed to approaching objects: Influence of stimulus velocity on the transport and the grasp components. Neuropsychologia 1992; 30(10):877–897.

Kaiser MK and Mowafy L. Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observers' sensitivity to global tau. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993; 19(5): 1028-1040.

Kim NG and Grocki MJ. Multiple sources of information and time-to-contact judgments. Vision Research 2006; 46(12):1946-1958.

Lee DNA. Theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 1976;5 (4): 437-459.

Mason AH and Carnahan H. Target viewing time and velocity effects on prehension. Experimental Brain Research1999; 127:83-94.

Merchant H and Georgopoulos AP. Neurophysiology of perceptual and motor aspects of interception. Journal of Neurophysiology 2006; 95: 1-13.

Merchant H, Zarco W, Prado L, Perez O.Behavioral and neurophysiological aspects of target interception. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 2009; 629: 201-220.

Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9(1): 97-113.

Senot P, Prévos P, McIntyre J. Estimating time to contact and impact velocity when catching an accelerating object with the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003; 29: 219-237.

Smeets JBJ and Brenner E. Perception and Action Are Based on the Same Visual Information: Distinction Between Position and Velocity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995; 21(1): 19-31

Tresilian JR. Hitting a moving target: Perception and action in the timing of rapid interceptions. Perception & Psychophysics 2005; 67(1):129-149.

Tresilian JR. Visually timed action: time-out for ‘tau’? Trends in cognitive sciences 1999; 3(8): 301-310.

Tresilian JR and Lonergan A. Intercepting a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude. Experimental Brain Research 2002; 142: 193–207.

van Donkelaar P, Lee RG, Gellman RS. Control strategies in directing the hand to moving targets. Experimental Brain Research 1992; 91: 151-161.

Yilmaz EH and Warren WH. Visual control of braking: A test of the τ hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995; 21(5): 996-101.


Supporting Agencies





| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019