Home About Login Current Archives Announcements Editorial Board
Submit Now For Authors Call for Submissions Statistics Contact
Home > Archives > Volume 11, No 4 (2013) > Article

DOI: 10.14704/nq.2013.11.4.703

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Mind and Consciousness

Attila Grandpierre, Deepak Chopra, Murali P. Doraiswamy, Rudolph Tanzi, Menas C. Kafatos


In the last 400 years physics has achieved great success, in theory and experimentation, determining the structure of matter and energy. The next great step in the evolution of science will be exploring the role of mind and consciousness in the universe, employing mathematics and fundamental theoretical constructs to yield specific predictions. Based on recent findings in biological autonomy, we propose to approach consciousness from the key aspect of decision-making. This approach allows us to develop a quantitative theory of consciousness as manifested in information processing. Since decision-making occurs at a certain level of organization, natural relations are obtained between consciousness at one level of organization and unconsciousness at another. By following this chain of argument, we also consider the possibility that levels of consciousness and unconsciousness form a self-closing hierarchy. This line of reasoning has led us to theoretically formulate the possible relationships between mind, cellular activity (both neuronal and non-neuronal), and the universe, working with the categories of consciousness, self-consciousness, and unconsciousness. What we propose in the present paper is a natural and straightforward extension of information theory to quantitative measures of consciousness at different levels and scales. A framework that integrates data from multiple disciplines can help us develop a broader theory of consciousness than what is possible from any single field alone. We present quantitative estimations for the rates of information processing at the global and cellular levels of the human organism and suggest values at the level of the universe. Our picture yields a new, quantitative picture of the mental capabilities of Homo sapiens and a reformulation of our place in the universe.


A Multidisciplinary Approach to Mind and Consciousness

Full Text



Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K and Walter P. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 5th ed. Garland Science, 2008; p.1115.

Alberts B. The Cell as a Collection of Protein Machines: Preparing the Next Generation of Molecular Biologists. Cell 1998; 92: 291–294.

Anderson CH, Van Essen DC and Olshausen BA. Directed visual attention and the dynamic control of information flow, in Itti, L., Rees, G. and Tsotsos, J. (eds.) Neurobiology of Attention, Burlington, MA/San Diego, CA/London: Elsevier Academic Press, 2005; pp. 11–17.

Baumeister EE, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M and Tice DM. Ego Depletion: Is the Active Self a Limited Resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998; 74: 1252-1265.

Bauer E. Elméleti biológia (Theoretical Biology). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó (in Hungarian: 1967; an abridged version in English: 1982; in Russian: 1935/1982/1993/2002).

Bedau MA. Four puzzles about life, in Bedau, M. A. and Cleland, C. E. (eds.) The Nature of Life: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010; p.393.

Butler S. Darwin among the machines & Lucubratio ebria, in Jones, H. F. (ed.), The notebooks of Samuel Butler, author of ‘Erewhon’, New York: Dutton, 1863/1917; pp.46–53.

Butler S. The deadlock in Darwinism, in Streatfeild, R. A. (ed.), The humor of Homer and other essays, Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press, 1967; pp. 253–254.

Cowan N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001; 24: 87–185.

Davies P. Emergent Biological Principles and the Computational Properties of the Universe. Explaining It or Explaining It Away. Complexity 2004; 10: 11-15.

Dennett D. Consciousness, in Gregory, R. L. and Zangwill, O. L. (eds.) The Oxford Companion to Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

Einstein A and Infeld L. The Evolution of Physics: From Early Concept to Relativity and Quanta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1938.

Görnitz T. The Meaning of Quantum Theory. Reinterpreting the Copenhagen Interpretation. Advanced Science Letters 2011; 4: 3727-3734.

Grandpierre A. The Nature of the Universe and the Ultimate Organizational Principle. Ultimate Reality and Meaning 2000; 23: 12-35.

Grandpierre A. Az élő Világegyetem könyve (The Book of the Living Universe, in Hungarian). Budapest: Válasz, 2002.

Grandpierre A. Biological Extension of the Action Principle: Endpoint Determination beyond the Quantum Level and the Ultimate Physical Roots of Consciousness, NeuroQuantology 2007; 5: 346-362.

Grandpierre A. Fundamental complexity measures of life, in Seckbach, J. and Gordon, R. (eds.) Divine Action and Natural Selection: Questions of Science and Faith in Biological Evolution, Singapore: World Scientific, 2008; pp. 566 - 615.

Grandpierre A. On the Biological Origin of Design in Nature, in Swan, L.S., Gordon, R., and Seckbach, J. (eds.) Origin(s) of Design in Nature: A Fresh, Interdisciplinary Look at How Design Emerges in Complex Systems, Especially Life. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012a; pp. 17-41.

Grandpierre A. Az élő Világegyetem könyve, újragondolt kiadás (The Book of the Living Universe – a Thoroughly Rethought Version, in Hungarian), Budapest: Titokfejtő, 2012b.

Grandpierre A. The Origin of Cellular Life and Biosemiotics. February 2013, Biosemiotics, Online First, Springer. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12304-013-9173-9

Grandpierre A and Kafatos M. Biological Autonomy. Philosophy Study 2012; 2: 631-649.

Grandpierre A and Kafatos M. Genuine Biological Autonomy: How can the Spooky Finger of Mind Play on the Physical Keyboard of the Brain? In: Hanna, P. (ed.) An Anthology of Philosophical Studies, 2013; Vol. 7, pp. 83-98.

Margulis L and Sagan D. Sentient symphony, in Bedau, M. A. and Cleland, C. E. (eds.) The Nature of Life. Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010; pp. 340-354.

Kafatos M and Nadeau R. The Conscious Universe, Dordrecht: Springer Verlag, 2000.

Kornberg, Arthur. 1989. For the love of enzymes. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.

Lehrl S and Fischer B. A basic information psychological parameter (BIP) for the reconstruction of concepts of intelligence. European Journal of Personality 1990; 4: 259-286.

Lloyd S. Computational Capacity of the Universe. Phys Rev Lett 2002; 88: 237901.

Manousakis E. Founding Quantum Theory on the Basis of Consciousness, Foundations of Physics 2006; 36: 795 – 838.

Mero L. Habits of Mind: The Power and Limits of Rational Thought, Springer: New York, 2002.

Milonni PW. The Quantum Vacuum. An Introduction to Quantum Electrodynamics. London: Academic Press, 1994.

Norretranders T. The User Illusion. Cutting Consciousness Down to Size. New York: Penguin Books, 1999.

Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.

Rieder MK, Rahm B, Williams JD and Kaiser J. Human gamma-band activity and behavior. International Journal of Psychophysiology 2011; 79: 39-48.

Sousa T, Paterson R, Moore V, Carlsson A, Abrahamsson B and Basit AW. The gastrointestinal microbiota as a site for the biotransformation of drugs. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2008; 363: 1–25.

Theise N and Kafatos MC. Sentience Everywhere: Complexity Theory, Panpsychism & the Role of Sentience in Self-Organization of the Universe. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research 2013; 4: 378-390.

Toepfer G. Teleology and its constitutive role for biology as the science of organized systems in nature. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2012; 43: 113-119.

Weinberg S. Reductionism Redux. The New York Review of Books, 1995; October 5.

Weiss V. Memory Span as the Quantum of Action of Thought. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 1995; 14: 387-408.

Whitman WB, Coleman DC and Wiebe WJ. Prokaryotes: The unseen majority. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998; 95: 6578–6583.