Home About Login Current Archives Announcements Editorial Board
Submit Now For Authors Call for Submissions Statistics Contact
Home > Archives > Volume 16, No 9 (2018) > Article

DOI: 10.14704/nq.2018.16.9.1685

Falsification Experiments for Spacetime Theories from the Neurological Sciences

Ronald Gruber, Ryan Smith, Richard Block


One difficulty with spacetime theories is the absence of falsifications tests. Because the observer is part of quantum mechanics (QM) and therefore an obligatory part of cosmological theories that incorporate QM, the neurological sciences have a legitimate role. We examined six different QM based cosmological theories. They make implications about various aspects of the flow of time (FOT)--the past/present/future experience including subjective dynamism). First, a distinction is made between the FOT and the physical passage of time (POT), the occurrence of a new physical event at the periphery of an expanding universe. Four theories suggesting a real POT are the Evolving Block Universe, the Spacetime Dynamics Theory, Causal Set Cosmology; and Muller’s cosmology. However, they retain the past/present components of the Block Universe and imply that the upper level FOT (the experience that the ‘present’ is unique) is illusory. A falsification experiment is proposed utilizing Hartle’s proposed Information and Gathering and Utilizing Systems (IGUSs), which have different experiences of the ‘present’. A virtual reality IGUS which can experientially navigate between past and present is suggested. It could confirm their implication that the experience of past/present events is not unique (i.e., it is a variable cognition). Barbour’s timeless theory involves relative configuration spaces which contain enough information to provide an illusory dynamic scene. That experience of dynamism within that scene is said to be an illusion. A second falsification experiment is proposed to remove dynamism suggesting it is an irrelevant experience. It involves intermittent stimulation of the newly discovered consciousness center (the claustrum) to create brief intervals of unconsciousness. Doing this precludes the recently discovered ‘happening’ percept which can account for the entirely of dynamism (the lower level FOT). The negative implication for Temporal Naturalism in the Cosmological Natural Selection theory is briefly discussed.


Falsification Tests; Evolving Block Universe; Temporal Naturalism; Flow of Time; Passage of Time

Full Text



Barbour JB. Nows are all we need. In H. Atmanspacher & E. Ruhnau (Eds.), Time, temporality, now. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1997.

Barbour J, Koslowski T, Mercati F. Identification of a gravitational arrow of time. Physical Review Letters 2014; 113(18): 181101.

Block RA, Gruber RP. Time perception, attention, and memory: a selective review. Acta Psychologica 2014; 149: 129-33.

Capozziello S, De Laurentis MF, Fatibene L, Ferraris M, Garruto S. Extended cosmologies. SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications 2016; 12: 006.

Carroll S. The big picture. New York: Dutton, 2016.

Crick FC, Koch C. What is the function of the claustrum?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 2005; 360(1458): 1271-79.

Davies P. That mysterious flow. Scientific American 2002; 287(3):40-47.

Dirac PA. The large numbers hypothesis and the Einstein theory of gravitation. Proceedings Royal Society of London A 1979; 365(1720):19-30.

Dowker F. The birth of spacetime atoms as the passage of time. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2014; 1326(1):18-25.

Ellis GF. The evolving block universe and the meshing together of times. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2014; 1326(1): 26-41.

Ellis GF, Rothman T. Time and spacetime: the crystallizing block universe. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 2010; 49(5): 988-1003.

Elitzur AC, Dolev S. Becoming as a bridge between quantum mechanics and relativity. InEndophysics, Time, Quantum And The Subjective: (With CD-ROM) 2005: 589-606.

Elitzur AC. Consciousness and the passage of time: Two persistent wonders—or one. Frontier Perspectives 1991; 2: 27-33.

Foundalis HE. Why Does Time “Flow†but Space Is? Answers in Evolution and Cognition. Essay for the Fqxi contest on the nature of time. Retrieved September. 2008; 2: 2014.from http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/276.

Friedman D, Pizarro R, Or-Berkers K, Neyret S, Pan X, Slater M. A method for generating an illusion of backwards time travel using immersive virtual reality—an exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology 2014; 5: 943.

Gibson JJ. Events are perceivable but time is not. InThe study of time II. New York: Springer Verlag, 1975: 295-301.

Gruber RP, Price RH, Matthews SM, Cordwell WR, Wagner LF. The impossibility of a simple derivation of the Schwarzschild metric. American Journal of Physics 1988; 56(3): 265-69.

Gruber RP, Brahm DE. Clock asynchrony and mass variation. General relativity and gravitation 1993;25(4):361-64.

Gruber R. Neurophysics of the Flow of Time. The Journal of Mind and Behavior 2008: 239-53.

Gruber RP, Bach M, Block RA. Perceiving two levels of the flow of time. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2015; 22(5-6): 7-22.

Gruber RP, Block RA. Perception of Scenes in Different Sensory Modalities: A Result of Modal Completion. American Journal of Psychology 2017; 130(1): 23-34.

Gruber RP, Wagner LF, Block RA. Subjective time versus proper (clock) time. In Studies on the structure of time. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2000.

Hameroff S, Penrose R. Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR’theory. Physics of Life Reviews 2014; 11(1): 39-78.

Hameroff S. How quantum brain biology can rescue conscious free will. Frontiers in Ä°ntegrative Neuroscience 2012; 6: 93.

Hartle JB. The physics of now. American Journal of Physics 2005; 73(2): 101-09.

Koch C. The Quest for Consciousness Englewood. Colorado: Roberts and Company Publishers, 2004.

Koubeissi MZ, Bartolomei F, Beltagy A, Picard F. Electrical stimulation of a small brain area reversibly disrupts consciousness. Epilepsy & Behavior 2014; 37: 32-35.

Mach E. The science of mechanics: A critical and historical account of its development (TJ McCormack, Trans.). La Salle, IL: Open Court.(Original work published 1883) 1960.

Muller RA, Maguire S. Now, and the Flow of Time. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.07975. 2016.

Muller RA. NOW: The physics of time. New York: WW Norton & Company; 2016.

Park D. The myth of the passage of time. The study of time 1972: 110-21.

Päs H. Can the Many-Worlds-Interpretation be probed in Psychology?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04878. 2016.

Pessoa L, De Weerd P, editors. Filling-in: From perceptual completion to cortical reorganization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.

Price RH, Romano JD. In an expanding universe, what doesn't expand?. arXiv preprint gr-qc/0508052. 2005.

Price H. The flow of time. In Oxford Handbook of Time. C. Callender, Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996: 276-311.

Rickles D, Kon M. Interdisciplinary perspectives on the flow of time. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2014; 1326(1): 1-8.

Rovelli C. The order of time. New York: Riverhead Books, 2018.

Ruhnau E. The deconstruction of time and the emergence of temporality. InTime, temporality, now Berlin: Springer, 1997: 53-69.

Sider T. Four-Dimensionalism. Clarendon, Oxford, 2001.

Smolin L. Temporal naturalism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2015; 52: 86-102.

Smolin L. Cosmological natural selection as the explanation for the complexity of the universe. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2004; 340(4): 705-13.

Sorkin RD. Relativity theory does not imply that the future already exists: a counterexample. InRelativity and the Dimensionality of the World. Chicago: Springer, 2007: 153-61.

Stapp HP. Mindful universe. Berlin: Springer, 2011.

Unger RM, Smolin L. The singular universe and the reality of time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Uzan JP. Varying constants, gravitation and cosmology. Living Reviews in Relativity 2011; 14(1): 2.

VanRullen R, Zoefel B, Ilhan B. On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 2014; 369(1641): 20130214.

VanRullen R, Koch C. Is perception discrete or continuous?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003; 7(5): 207-13.

Williams DC. The myth of passage. The Journal of Philosophy. 1951; 48(15): 457-72.