Home About Login Current Archives Announcements Editorial Board
Submit Now For Authors Call for Submissions Statistics Contact
Home > Archives > Volume 12, No 2 (2014) > Article

DOI: 10.14704/nq.2014.12.2.754

The Extended Brain: Cyclic Information Flow in a Quantum Physical Realm

Dirk K.F. Meijer


The present knowledge of the brain neurology, collectively, is insufficient to explain higher mental processes such as (self)-consciousness, qualia, intuition, meditative states, transpersonal experiences as well as ultra rapid brain responses and functional binding between distant parts of the brain. It is proposed that super-causal space-time configurations may function as an interface between molecular transitions and the particular higher mental functions. As super-causal principles, the iso-energetic brain model as well as various quantum brain theories, are treated. Iso-energetic states of the brain may enable protein perturbation mediated information processing within a tenth of a millisecond and make use of subjective space-time configuration created in life as an emergent modality of the neural system. In addition, elementary quantum processes are seen as essential for higher brain functions, since our central nervous system forms an integral part of a dynamic universe as a non-local information processing modality. In this respect, quantum physics also allows the build-up of an individual mental knowledge domain on the basis of self-selective imprinting of a geometric space/time dimension, as induced by wave/ particle transitions in the brain. The central hypothesis of the present paper is that a versatile and rapid responding brain function requires complementary information processing mechanisms both at the iso-energetic and quantum (macro- and micro-) levels, enabling bottom up and top down information processing. This requires a nested organization of fine-tuned neural micro-sites that enable coherence/de-coherence transitions as a basis for information transfer. For a rapid and causally effective flux of information, as well as a continuous updating of a personal information domain, a “bi-cyclic†mental workspace is conceived, housing interacting and entangled wave and protein-based perturbations that build-up and retrieve information from a universal knowledge domain.


universal information field; super-causal brain mechanisms; iso-energetic brain; quantum brain models; mind/matter; cyclic mental workspace; complementary processes for ultra rapid brain responses

Full Text



Abbott DW, Davies PC, Pati AK. (Editors) Quantum Aspects of Life. Imperial College Press. London, 2008.

Aharonov Y and Vaidman L. Properties of a quantum system during the time interval between two measurements. Physical Review 1990; 41(1):11-20.

Aharonov Y, Popescu S, Tollaksen J. A time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics. Physics Today 2010; November, pp.27-32.

Allefeld C, Atmansacher H, Wackerkanm J. Mental states as macrostates emerging from brain electrical dynamics. Chaos 2009; 19 (1): 1-32

Amoroso RL. An Introduction to Noetic Field Theory: The Quantization of Mind. Noetic Journal 1999; 2(1): 28-39.

Arndt M, Juffmann T and Vedral V. Quantum physics meets biology, HFSP Journal 2009; 3(6): 386–400. doi: 10.2976/1.3244985

Atmanspacher H. Contextual emergence from physics to cognitive neuroscience. J Consciousness Studies 2007; 14:18-36.

Atmanspacher H. Rotter S. Interpreting neurodynamics: concepts and facts. Cogn Neurodyn 2008; 2: 297-318.

Atmanspacher H, Filk T, Römer H. Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception. Biol Cybern 2004; 90: 33-40.

Atmanspacher H. Mind and Matter as asymptotically disjoint, inequivalent representations with broken time-reversal symmetry.


Atmanspacher H. Quantum approaches to consciousness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2011; 1-33.

Baylor DA, Lamb TD, Yau KW. Responses of retinal rods to single photons. J Physiol 1979; 288:613-634.

Beck F, Eccles J Quantum aspects of brain activity and the role of consciousness. PNAS USA 1992; 89:11357-11361.

Beck F. Eccles J. Quantum Processes in the Brain: A scientific basis of consciousness. In: N. Osaka (Ed.), Neural Basis of Consciousness. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2003.

Beck F. My Odyssey with Sir John Eccles. NeuroQuantology 2008b; 6(2):161-163 DOI: 10.14704/nq.2008.6.2.170

Beck F. Quantum brain dynamics and consciousness. In: The physical nature of consciousness. Ed. P. van Locke, Amsterdam, Benjamins; 2001, pp 83-116.

Beck F. Synaptic Quantum Tunnelling in Brain Activity. NeuroQuantology 2008a; 6(2): 140-151. doi: 10.14704/nq.2008.6.2.168

Bennet CH, Wiesner S J. Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Phys Rev Lett 1992; 69, 2881

Bergson H. L ’Evolution Créatrice. 1907 ; 90e edition Paris PUF ; 1957

Bernroider G. Roy S. Quantum-Classical Correspondence in the Brain: Scaling, Action Distances and Predictability behind Neural Signals. Forma 2004; 19: 55–68.

Bitbol M and Luisi PL. Science and the Self-Referentiality of Consciousness. Journal of Cosmology 2011; 14: 1-18.

Bode S, He AH, Soon CS, Trampel R, Turner R. Tracking the Unconscious Generation of Free Decisions Using UItra-High Field fMRI. PLoS ONE 2011; 6(6): e21612. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021612

Bohm D. A new theory of the relationship of mind and matter. Philosophical Psychology 1990; 3:271-286.

Bohm D, Hiley B J. An ontological basis for the quantum theory. Physics Reports, 1987; 144:323-348.

Bókkon I, Salari V, Tuszynski J, Antal I. Estimation of the number of biophotons involved in the visual perception of a single-object image: biophoton intensity can be considerably higher inside cells than outside. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 2010; 100:160-166.

Boyden ES, Zhang F, Bamberg E, Nagel G, Deisseroth K. Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8 (9):1263–1268.

Briegel HJ, Browne DE, Dür W, Raussendorf R, Van den Nest M. Measurementâ€based quantum computation. Nature Physics 2009; 5: 19.

Bruza PD, Busemeyer JR. Quantum models of cognition and decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2012.

Burke RC and Persinger MA. Convergent quantitative solutions indicating the human hippocampus as a singularity and access to cosmological consciousness. NeuroQuuantology 2013; 11(1): 1-7.

Carter P J. Imaginary Physics. 2014 b. http://vixra.org/pdf/1210.0124v3.pdf

Carter PJ. Consciousness and Perception in Higher-Dimensional Quantum Space-time. NeuroQuantology 2014; 12(1):46-75.

Caswell JM, Dotta BT, Persinger MA. Cerebral Biophoton Emission as a Potential Factor In Non-local Human- Machine interaction. NeuroQuantology 2014; 12(1): 1-11.

Churchland PM. Matter and consciousness: a contemporary introduction to the philosophy of mind. Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press. 1988.

Clark KB. Bioreaction computing without quantum diffusion. NeuroQuantology, 2012; 10(4): 646-654.

Conrad M. Amplification of superpositional effects through electronic-conformational interactions. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 1994; 4:423-438.

Cramer J. An Overview of the Transactional Interpretation. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 1988; 27: 227.

Davia CJ. Life, Catalysis and Excitable Media: Dynamic Systems Approach to Metabolism and Cognition. In: The Emerging Physics of Consciousness, (Ed J.A. Tuszynski), Springer Berlin, 2010; pp.255-292.

Davies P, Gregersen NH. Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics to Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Davies PCW. Quantum fluctuations and life. 2004; Available on: arXiv:quant-ph/0403017

De Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Jansma JM, Fukunaga M, Bianciardi M, Duyn JH. Hemodynamic nonlinearities affect BOLD fMRI response timing and amplitude. Neuroimage 2009; 47:1649-58.

Di Biase F. A Holo-informational Model of Consciousness. Quantum Biosystems 2009; 3:207-220.

Diaz J-L. Mind-brain unity, dual aspect and the emergence of consciousness. Philos Psychol 2000; 13:393- 403.

Dotta BT, Saroka KS, Persinger MA. Increased photon emission from the head while imagining light in the dark is correlated with changes in electroencephalographic power: Support for Bókkon's Biophoton Hypothesis. Neurosci Lett 2012; 513: 151–154.

Eccles JC. Evolution of consciousness. PNAS USA 1992; 89: 7320-7324.

Edelman GM, Tononi G. The universe of consciousness. How matter becomes imagination. Basic Books New York, 2001.

Edelman GM. Wider than the Sky: The Phenomenal Gift of Consciousness, Yale Univ. Press, 2004

Edwards P. Panpsychism. In: Paul Edwards (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Philosophy; 1967; vol. 5.

Ehresmann AC. A Multi-scale Dynamical Model for Neuro-Bio Systems. Application to Neural Processing and to Aging. 2011, http://ehres.pagesperso-orange.fr/Neuro-bio.pdf

Fingelkurts AA, Fingelkurts AA, Neves CFH. Consciousness as a phenomenon in the operational architectonics of brain organization. Criticality and self-organization considerations. Chaos Solitons & Fractals 2013; 55: 13-31.

Freeman WJ and Vitiello G. Nonlinear brain dynamics as macroscopic manifestation of underlying many-body field dynamics. Physics of Life Reviews 2006; 3(2): 93–118.

Fröhlich H. Long range coherence and the actions of enzymes. Nature 1970; 228: 1093.

Fröhlich H. Long-range coherence and energy storage in biological systems. Int J Quantum Chem 1968; 2: 641–649.

Fröhlich H. The extraordinary dielectric properties of biological materials and the action of enzymes. PNAS USA 1975; 72: 4211–4215.

Georgiev DD and Glazebrook D. Dissipation waves for information transfer in neurobiology- Some implications. Informatica 2006; 30: 221-232.

Georgiev DD. The causal consciousness. b-Neurexin promotes neuromediator release via vibrationally assisted multidimensional tunneling. http://cogprints.org/2809/1/causal.pdf?origin=publication_detail

Germine M. The Holographic Principle Theory of Mind. 2007; http://goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2007/holomind.htm

Grandpierre A , Chopra D, Doraiswami P M, Tanzi R, Kafatos M C. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Mind and Consciousness. NeuroQuantology 2013; 11: 607-617.

Grandpierre A. The Nature of Man-Universe Connection. The Noetic Journal 1999; 2:52-67.

Grandpierre A. The Physics of Collective Consciousness. World Futures. J Gen Evolution 1997; 48(1-4):23-56.

Hagan S, Hameroff SR, Tuszynski JA. Quantum computation in brain microtubules: Decoherence and biological feasibility. Phys Rev E 2002; 65: 061901.

Haggard P, Eimer M. On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements. Exp Brain Res 1999; 126: 128-133.

Haggard P. Conscious intention and motor cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 2005; 9: 290-295.

Hameroff S, Penrose R. Consciousness in the universe. A review of the ‘Orch OR’ theory Phys Life Rev 2013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2013.08.002

Hameroff S, Penrose R. Consciousness in the Universe: Neuroscience, Quantum Space-Time Geometry and Orch OR Theory, In: Cosmology of Consciousness: Quantum Physics& Neuroscience of Mind, Cosmology Science Publishers, Cambridge 2011: pp.51- 102.

Hameroff S. How quantum brain biology can rescue conscious free will. Frontiers in Integral Neurosciences 2012; doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00093

Hameroff S. More Neural Than Thou in: Toward a Science of Consciousness II: The 1996 Tucson Discussions and Debates, Editors Stuart Hameroff, Alfred Kaszniak, Alwyn Scott, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1