DOI: 10.14704/nq.2015.13.2.835

Quantum-Everted Meta-Scientific Lensing as an Arbiter of the Hard Problem

Donald Mender


A specific modification of metascientific epistemological standards is developed for the purpose of assessing the putative applicability of quantum mechanics to a physical understanding of consciousness. Formal properties of this epistemic alteration are summarized in a virtual construct called the quantum-everted meta-scientific (QuEMS) Lens. The feasibility of programming a digital approximation of the QuEMS Lens, inputting well accepted data from mainstream neurocognitive research, and inferring the relevance of quantum constructs from the output, is proposed.


covering law; cunning of the observable; decoherence; epistemology; eversion; geisteswissenschaften; Hard Problem of Consciousness; metascience; OrchOR; refutation; thermofield; web of belief

Full Text:

Full Text PDF


Chaitin G. Randomness and Mathematical Proof. Sci Am May 1975; 232:5:47-52.

Chalmers D. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Consciousness Studies 1995; 2:3:200-219.

Globus G. Quantum closures and disclosures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2003.

Hempel C. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: The Free Press, 1965.

Jibu M, Yasue K. Quantum brain dynamics and consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1995.

Mender D. The implicit possibility of dualism in quantum probabilistic cognitive modeling: a commentary on the work of Pothos and Busemeyer. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2013a; 36:3:298-299.

Mender D. The cunning of the observable: generalized Fourier duality, the hard problem, and natural kinds of psychopathology. Quantum Biosystems 2013b; 5:2:43-53.

Penrose R. Shadows of the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

Popper K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic Books, 1959.

Quine W V O. Two dogmas of empiricism. Phil Rev 1951; 60:20-43.

Tegmark M. The importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Phys Rev 2000; E61:4194-206.

Vitiello G: My Double Unveiled: the dissipative quantum model of the brain. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001.

Supporting Agencies

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019