DOI: 10.14704/nq.2013.11.4.670

A Replication of the Slight Effect of Human Thought on a Pseudorandom Number Generator

Azlan Iqbal

Abstract


Experiments conducted and repeated worldwide over the last five decades have claimed to show that human consciousness, intention or thought (often termed ‘psychokinesis’ or ‘telekinesis’) can have an effect on random number generators. The reason for this, or even its acceptance by mainstream science, is still uncertain. Quantum mechanics or some other as yet undiscovered aspect of the natural world is typically preferred as a tentative explanation compared to mysticism or invoking the supernatural. Given that many different types of computer programs – even those used in experiments and simulations – rely to some extent on (pseudo)random number generators, any external effect such as this could be significant and should be accounted for. To test if a random number generator used by a computer program could be affected by psychokinesis, we developed a simple program that generated a sequence of 30 random integers between 1 and 10. Along with its mean or average, this constituted one ‘cycle’. Thirty cycles were evaluated and the ‘overall’ average was used as a means of comparing situations where, using two subjects, human thought was directed at increasing or decreasing the values of the numbers generated and where it was not (the control). Consistent with previous ‘successful’ experiments, a small but noticeable and significant effect on the overall averages was present. While this remains fascinating yet of little consequence in and of itself, the potential of a kind of ‘butterfly effect’ in computer systems where random number generators are involved in proximity to humans should be further investigated.

NeuroQuantology | December 2013 | Volume 11 | Issue 4 | Page 519-526

Keywords


psychokinesis; mind-matter interaction; pseudorandom number generator; random number generator; RNG; computer

Full Text:

Full Text PDF

References


Bosch H, Steinkamp F, Boller E. Examining Psychokinesis - The Interaction of Human Intention with Random Number Generators. A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2006; 132: 497-523.

Broughton RS. Parapsychology: The Controversial Science. Ballantine Books: New York, USA; 1991.

Chalmers D. Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 1995; 2 (3): 200-19.

Chalmers D. The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2010; 17: 7-65.

Haraldsson E, Wiseman R. Two Investigations of Ostensible Macro-PK in India. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research 1996; 61 (843): 109-113.

Iqbal A. Increasing Efficiency and Quality in the Automatic Composition of Three-Move Mate Problems. in Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2011; 6972: 186-197. Anacleto, J.; Fels, S.; Graham, N.; Kapralos, B.; Saif El-Nasr, M.; Stanley, K. (Eds.). 1st Edition., 2011, XVI. Springer. ISBN 978-3-642-24499-5.

Jahn RG. The Persistent Paradox of Psychic Phenomena: An Engineering Perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE 1982; 70 (2): 136-170.

Kugel W. A Faulty PK Meta-Analysis. Journal of Scientific Exploration 2011; 25 (1): 47-62.

Lowry R. Apparent PK Effect on Computer-generated Random Digit Series. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 1981; 75: 209-220.

McMoneagle J. The Stargate Chronicles. Hampton Roads Publishing Company, Inc.: USA; 2002.

Pitkänen M. Two Attempts to Understand PK; 2012. Available from: http://vixra.org/pdf/1210.0059v1.pdf

Radin DI. Experimental Attempts to Influence Pseudorandom Number Sequences. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 1982; 76: 359-374.

Radin DI, Utts J. Experiments Investigating the Influence of Intention on Random and Pseudorandom Events. Journal of Scientific Exploration. 1989; 3 (I): 65-79.

Radin DI. Enhancing Effects in Psi Experiments with Sequential Analysis: A Replication and Extension. European Journal of Parapsychology 1990-1991; 8: 98-111.

Shear J ed. Explaining Consciousness: The Hard Problem. The MIT Press, London; 1997.

Shimizu T, Ishikawa M. Field RNG Data Analysis, Based on Viewing the Japanese Movie Departures (Okuribito). Journal of Scientific Exploration 2010; 24 (4): 637-654.

Sloan D. I, Universe. Self-Published; 2013. Available from: http://darrylsloan.wordpress.com/i-universe

Wilson C. Supernatural. Watkins Publishing, London; 2011.

Wiseman R. ‘Heads I Win, Tails You Lose’: How Parapsychologists Nullify Null Results. Skeptical Inquirer 2010; 34(1): 36-39.

Wiseman R, Greening E. 'It's Still Bending': Verbal Suggestion and Alleged Psychokinetic Ability. British Journal of Psychology 2005; 96: 115-127.

Wiseman R, Haraldsson E. Investigating Macro-PK in India: Swami Premananda. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research 1995; 60 (839): 193-202.

Wiseman R, Watt C. 'Twitter' as a New Research Tool: Proof of Principle with a Mass-Participation Test of Remote Viewing. European Journal of Parapsychology 2010; 25: 89-100.


Supporting Agencies

Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), Malaysia.



| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019