DOI: 10.14704/nq.2013.11.3.669

Exploring a Quantum-Hebbian Approach Towards Learning and Cognition

Priti Gupta, Chota Madan Markan


Cognition, in all its diverse forms, can be attributed to the formation of specialized neural circuits in the brain. While in response to conscious experiences, arising due to sensory stimulation, neural assemblies are formed, conscious experience is itself an outcome of sustained synchronous firing of a neural assembly. This leads to a paradoxical situation or Neural Development Paradox: what comes first the conscious experience or the neural assembly? To have zero-lag synchronous activity amongst neurons of an assembly, which is needed for binding individual responses into a conscious percept, we need a very rapid source of communication between them. Axonal conduction delays amounting to several tens of milliseconds cannot account for the zero-lag synchrony across spatially separated brain an area that is required for STDP Hebbian learning to hardwire a neural assembly. Hence, an alternate means of instantaneous communication needs to be explored. According to the Penrose-Hameroff Quantum Approach towards consciousness, the microtubule cytoskeleton acts as a quantum computer whose collapsed states are conscious experiences manifesting in the form of an activated neural assembly. Neurons, whose microtubules are entangled, get connected by means of gap junctions, behaving like one giant neuron, firing in synchrony, seemingly breaking the Neural Development Paradox. By mental force of directed attention, Quantum Zeno effect can be instigated, as suggested by Von Neumann-Stapp, causing the activated state of the brain to stabilize till Hebbian learning strengthens the synaptic connections, giving way to a quantum explanation for the formation of neural assemblies, both intra-modality as well as inter-modality. In this paper we report our efforts towards building a simulation-mathematical model of Quantum-Hebbian Learning that attempts to interface classical Hebbian learning with quantum theoretic mechanisms of conscious experience to develop neural assemblies. Under the influence of a modulatory mental force of directed attention, the model is also able to address high level issues like mind wandering, zombie modes, volition etc. The model is an attempt to study the benefits of introducing the concept of duality in the formation of neural assemblies and understand how consciousness and attention influence the development of the brain.

NeuroQuantology | September 2013 | Volume 11 | Issue 3 | Page 416-425


cognition; neural assemblies; quantum entanglement; quantum zeno effect; quantum neural computation; attention

Full Text:

Full Text PDF


Bandopadhyay A. Quantum aspects of microtubule: Direct experimental evidence for the existence of quantum states in microtubule. Towards a science of consciousness. May 2-8, 2011, Sweden.

Behrman EC, Gaddam K, Steck JE and Skinner SR. Microtubules as a quantum Hopfield network. In The Emerging Physics of Consciousness (pp. 351-370). Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2006.

Ben-Ari Y. Developing networks play a similar melody. Trends in Neuroscience 2001; 24: 353-360.

Brookes J. Quantum processes as a mechanism in olfaction for smell recognition? Bulletin of the American Physical Society 2011; 56.

Crick F. Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1984; 81(14): 4586-4590.

Chen N, Sugihara H, Sharma J, Perea G, Petravicz J, Le C and Sur M. Nucleus basalis-enabled stimulus-specific plasticity in the visual cortex is mediated by astrocytes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2012; 109(41): E2832-E2841.

Diósi L. Models for universal reduction of macroscopic quantum fluctuations. Physical Review A 1989; 40(3): 1165.

Edelman GM and Tononi G. Reentry and the dynamic core: neural correlates of conscious experience. Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and Conceptual Questions. pp.139-151, 2000.

Edelman GM. Wider than the sky: A revolutionary view of consciousness. ePenguin, 2005.

Elliott T and Shadbolt NR. A Neurotrophic Model of the Development of the Retinogeniculocortical Pathway Induced by Spontaneous Retinal Waves. Journal of Neuroscience 1999; 19(18): 7951–7970.

Ezhov A and Ventura D. Quantum neural networks. In Ed. N. Kasabov, Editor, Future Directions for Intelligent Systems and Information Science. Physica-Verlang, 2009.

Georgiev D. Mind Efforts, Quantum Zeno Effect and Environmental Decoherence. NeuroQuantology 2012; 10 (3): 374-388.

Goard M and Dan Y. Basal forebrain activation enhances cortical coding of natural scenes. Nature Neuroscience 2009; 12(11): 1444-1449.

Gupta S and Zia RKP. Quantum neural networks. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 2001; 63(3):355–383.

Hagan S, Hameroff SR and Tuszyński. Quantum computation in brain microtubules: decoherence and biological feasibility. Physical Review E 2002; 65(6): 061901.

Hameroff S. Orchestrated Reduction of Quantum Coherence in Brain Microtubules: A Model for Consciousness. NeuroQuantology 2007; 5(1):1-8.

Hameroff SR and Penrose R. Conscious Events as Orchestrated Spacetime Selections. NeuroQuantology 2003; 1: 10-35.

Hameroff SR and Penrose R. Conscious events as orchestrated space-time selections. Journal of Consciousness Studies 1996; 3(1): 36-53.

Swadlow HA and Waxman SG. Axonal conduction delays. Scholarpedia 2012; 7(6):1451. doi:10.4249/scholarpedia.1451,

Hebb DO. The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory, Wiley, 1949.

James W. The Principles of Psychology, with introduction by George A. Miller, Harvard University Press, 1890.

Kak S. On Quantum Neural Computing. Information Sciences 1995; 83: 143-163.

Koch C and Crick FC. On the zombie within. Nature 2001; 411(6840): 893-893.

König P, Engel AK, Löwel S and Singer W. Squint affects synchronization of oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience 1993; 5: 501- 508.

Lambert N, Chen YN, Cheng YC, Li CM, Chen YG and Nori F. Quantum Biology, Nature Physics 2012; 9: 10-18.

Llinas R and Pare D. Coherent oscillations in specific and nonspecific thalamo-cortical networks and their role in cognition. In Thalamus, E. G. Jones, Ed. (Amsterdam, Elsevier), 1998: 501-516.

Löwel S and Singer W. Selection of intrinsic horizontal connections in the visual cortex by correlated neuronal activity. Science 1992; 255(5041): 209-212.

Lumer ED, Edelman, GM and Tononi G. Neural dynamics in a model of the thalamocortical system. I. Layers, loops and the emergence of fast synchronous rhythms. Cerebral Cortex 1997; 7(3): 207-227.

Markan CM. Sequential development of orientation and ocular dominance maps: Reaction-diffusion approach (PhD Thesis), Department of Electrical Engineering, IIT Delhi, 1996.

Markan CM, Bhaumik B. Diffusive Hebbian model for orientation map formation. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 1999; 1: 88-91.

Martinetz T and Schulten K. A Neural Gas Network Learns Topologies. Elsevier Neural Networks 1991; pp.397-402.

Melloni L, Molina C, Pena M, Torres D, Singer W and Rodriguez E. Synchronization of neural activity across cortical areas correlates with conscious perception. The Journal of Neuroscience 2007; 27(11): 2858-2865.

Miranker WL. Quantum Neurons. Tech report, Univ. of Yale, Yale/DCS/tr1234, 2002.

Misra B and Sudarshan ECG. The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics 1977; 18: 756.

Mrsic-Flogel, TD and Bonhoeffer T. Neuroscience: Sibling neurons bond to share sensations. Nature 2012; 486(7401): 41-42.

Narayanan A, Menneer T. Quantum artificial neural network architectures and Components. Information Sciences 2002; 124(1-4): 231–255.

Penrose R. Newton, quantum theory and reality. In 300 years of gravity (Ed. S. W. Hawking & W. Israel). Cambridge University Press,1987.

Sackett DL. Structure and function in the tubulin dimer and the role of the acidic carboxyl terminus. Sub-cellular Biochemistry 1995; 24: 255.

Schwartz JM and Begley S. The mind and the brain. Harper Collins e-books, 2009.

Schwartz JM, Stapp HP and Beauregard M. Quantum physics in neuroscience and psychology: a neurophysical model of mind–brain interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2005; 360(1458): 1309-1327.

Srivastava DP, Sahni V and Satsangi PS. Graph-theoretic quantum system modelling for information/ computation processing circuits. International Journal of General Systems 2011; 40(8), 777-804

Srivastava DP, Sahni V and Satsangi PS. Graph Theoretic Quantum System Modelling for Neuronal Microtubules as Quantum Hopfield Networks, Toward a science of consciousness. March 3-9, 2013, Dayalbagh, Agra, India.

Stapp HP. Mind, matter and quantum mechanics. Berlin: Springer, 1993.

Stapp HP. Quantum theory and the role of mind in nature. Foundations of Physics 2001; 31(10): 1465-1499.

Stapp HP. Reply to a Critic: “Mind Efforts, Quantum Zeno Effect and Environmental Decoherence”. NeuroQuantology 2012; 10 (4): 601-605.

Stapp HP. Quantum Interactive Dualism, II: The Libet and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Causal Anomalies. Erkenntnis 2006; 65(1): 117-142.

Supporting Agencies

MHRD and DST, Govt. of India

| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019