DOI: 10.14704/nq.2013.11.2.623

A Heuristic View of the Neurobiological Correlates of Classical and Quantum Neural Computing from the Perspective of Autism

Antonio Cassella


The odd performance of autistic individuals in neuropsychological tests and anomalies in their discourse suggest that when nonautistic individuals face a problem, their minds enter quantum coherence: The legitimacy of involved prototypical schemata—guarded by classical neural computing, sequence, or the first attention—is suspended by quantum neural computing, simultaneity, or the second attention; and the consequences of conflicting variants of the schemata on hold are simulated in cerebellar microcomplexes. Within quantum decoherence: The second attention discerns a promising variant (learning); and the first attention will validate the new schema and shield it (memory) against illegitimate change if unfit mistakes are eradicated or amusing mistakes are introduced. In this article, psychological aspects of the quantum jump from coherence to decoherence (which autistics cannot follow), damage observed in autopsied brains of autistic subjects, and tertiary research on the cerebellum lead to heuristics on the neurobiological correlates of classical and quantum neural computing.

NeuroQuantology | June 2013 | Volume 11 | Issue 2 | Page 314-331


heuristic view; neurobiological correlates; quantum neural computing; autism

Full Text:

Full Text PDF


Albus JS. Theory of cerebellar function. Mathem Biosci 1971; 10:25-61.

Baron-Cohen S. Mindblindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.

Baron-Cohen S, Leslie A, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 1985; 21:37-46.

Bauman ML, Kemper TL. Structural brain anatomy in autism: What is the evidence? In Bauman ML, Kemper TL, editors. The neurobiology of autism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Unv Press, 2006. pp.121-135.

Bostan AC, Dum, RP, Strick PL. The basal ganglia communicate with the cerebellum. PNAS 2010; 107(18):8452-8456.

Cassella A. Self-other differentiation and self-other integration from the perspectives of language development and autism. Master’s thesis, Harvard Unv., 1997.

Cassella A. Fundamentos cognitivos y semióticos de la creatividad: Aportes del Autismo. Tesis Doctoral, UNESR, Caracas, Venezuela, 2000.

Cassella A. El desarrollo de la inteligencia social: Aportes del autismo. Maracaibo, Venezuela: Ediluz. 2002.

Cassella A. Readjusting what we know with what we imagine. In Allen R, editor. Human ecology economics: A framework for global sustainability. London: Routledge, 2008. pp. 230-257.

Cassella A. Autism and the interplay of deterministic and quantum information processing in the act of creation. NeuroQuantology 2011; 9(2):271-287.

Cassella A. (In press, a). Psychological roots of social and linguistic deficiencies in autism and the distinction between classical and quantum neural computing (Article 331161). In Patel VB, Preedy VR and Martin CR editors. The comprehensive guide to autism. London: Springer, 2013.

Cassella A. (in press, b). Neurobiological correlates of the complementarity of classical and quantum neural computing from the perspective of autism. In Patel VB, Preedy VR and Martin CR editors. The comprehensive guide to autism. London: Springer, 2013.

Feynman RP. The strange theory of light and matter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Unv Press, 1985.

Happé F. Annotation: Current psychological theories of autism. The “theory of mind” account and rival theories. J Child Psychol Psych 1994; 35(2):215-229.

Icke V. The force of symmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge Unv Press, 1995.

Ito M. The cerebellum: Brain for an implicit self. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Peared. 2011. Ito M. New concepts in cerebellar function. Rev Neurol 1993; 149(11):596-599.

Ito M. Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nat Neurosci 2008; 9:304-313.

Ito M, Sakurai M, Tongroach P. Climbing fibre induced depression of both mossy fiber responsiveness and glutamate sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol London 1982; 324:113-134.

Johnson M. The development of visual attention: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. In Cazzaniga MS, Editor. The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995. pp. 735-747.

Landry R, Bryson SB. Impaired disengagement of attention in young children with autism. J Child Psychol Psych 2004; 45(6):115-1122.

Leslie A, Roth D. What autism teaches us about metarepresentation. In Baron-Cohen S, Tager-Flusberg H., Cohen DJ, editors. Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism. Oxford: Oxford Unv Press 1993. Pp. 83-111.

Lloyd S. Programming the universe. New York: Alfred E. Knopf, 2006.

Perner J. Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.

Rodier PM, Arndt TL. The brainstem in autism. In Bauman ML, Kemper TL, editors. The neurobiology of autism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP. 2006. pp. 136-149.

Sears LL, Finn PR, Steinmetz JE. Abnormal classical eye-blink conditioning in autism. J Autism Dev Disord 1994; 24(6)737-751.

Sears LL, Vest C, Mohamed S et al. An MRI study of the basal ganglia in autism. Prog Neuro Psycho Psychoph 1999; 23(4):713-24.

Stanton ME, Erwin RJ, Rush AN et al. Eye blink conditioning in autism and a developmental rodent model. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2001; 23-297.

Zaitchik, D. When representations conflict with reality: The preschooler’s problem with false beliefs and “false” photographs. Cognition 1990; 35:41-68.

Supporting Agencies

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019