DOI: 10.14704/nq.2018.16.5.1325

Control Model of Watershed Water Environment System Simulating Human Neural Network Structure

Wei Zheng


On the basis of analyzing the characteristics of watershed water environment system, the neural network control model of watershed water environment system is established according to the neural network structure of human brain, so as to correct the errors of traditional water environment system control. The simulation results show that the proposed control algorithm has higher path-tracking accuracy and strong adaptability and robustness to the dynamic uncertain factors in the watershed water environment system.


Watershed Water Environment System, Cerebral Nervous System, Differential Correction

Full Text:



Cannistraro G, Cannistraro M, Trovato G. Islands "Smart Energy" for eco-sustainable energy a case study "Favignana Island", International Journal of Heat and Technology 2017;35(S1): S87-95.

Chiang GCT, Lin CS. CMAC with general basis functions. Neural Networks 1996; 9(7): 1199-1211.

Gounemat KM, Scliolz M, Tondar M. Hydrodvnamic modelling of free water-surface constructed storm water wetlands using a finite volume technique. Environmental Technology 2015; 36(20): 2532-47.

Houria HS, Bariza Z, Djamel H, Hocine B. DMFC water management in presence of heat sources. Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems 2017; 4(1): 59-62.

Hu J, Pratt G. Self-organizing CMAC neural networks and adaptive dynamic control. InIntelligent Control/ Intelligent Systems and Semiotics. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium 1999; 12(4): 259-65.

Huang XR, Dai W, Du BG. Resource-constrained project scheduling problem for large complex equipment: a hybrid approach using pareto genetic algorithm and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering 2016;14(1):12-21.

Kadri O, Mouss LH. Identification and detection of the process fault in a cement rotary kiln by extreme learning machine and ant colony optimization, Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering 2017; 15(2): 43-50.

Keshtkar MM. Energy, exergy analysis and optimization by a genetic algorithm of a system based on a solar absorption chiller with a cylindrical PCM and nano-fluid, International Journal of Heat and Technology 2017; 35(2): 416-20.

Lee HM, Chen CM, Lu YF. A self-organizing HCMAC neural-network classifier. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 2003; 14(1): 15-27.

Li B. Energy saving optimization of machining center process route based on improved genetic algorithm, Journal of Manufacturing Engineering 2017; 15(3): 35-42.

Macnab CJB. Preventing Overlearning in CMAC by using a short-term memory. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 2017; 19(6): 2020-32.

Ngo T, Phuong T. Robust adaptive self-organizing wavelet fuzzy CMAC tracking control for de-icing robot manipulator. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control 2015; 10(4): 567-78.

Sivakumar B, Woldemeskel FM, Puente CE. Nonlinear analysis of rainfall variability in Australia. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 2014; 28(1):17-27.

Franzitta V, Viola A, Curto D, Trapanese M. Nexus water & energy: A case study of wave energy converters (WECs) to desalination applications in Sicily. International Journal of Heat and Technology. 2016; 34(2): S379-86.

Wang TC, Xie YZ. BP-GA data fusion algorithm studies oriented to smart home, Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems 2016; 3(3): 135-40.

Yuan GS, Xie QS, Pan WJ. Color design based on kansei engineering and interactive genetic algorithm, Journal of Manufacturing Engineering 2017; 15(3): 12-18.

Zhang LY, Ji X, Sun S. The study on high speed turning parameters optimization of tc21 titanium alloy, Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering 2017; 15(2): 101-05.

Supporting Agencies

| NeuroScience + QuantumPhysics> NeuroQuantology :: Copyright 2001-2019